You are using IPv4 from 3.14.249.104
Main Headlines
New IPv6 Book "IPv6 for All"
Enable project releases Mobility publication
The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6
Consulintel: logos
 
SEARCH
Are you a...?
> POLICY MAKER
> JOURNALIST
> ISP
> MANAGER
> ENGINEER
> END USER
Keep informed, visit our
> NEWSROOM
Tell us your thoughts
on IPv6 > POLL
Looking for an
IPv6 Task Force? >
Questions? > FAQS
Jump to PROJECTS
Next EVENTS
000 members
050 guests
LOGIN 
Password 
Not member yet?
Get "extras". Register
Search Bar Plug-in
Firefox      IE7
Other News
(Feb 11, 2013)
(Feb 11, 2013)
(Feb 04, 2013)
(Feb 04, 2013)
(Feb 04, 2013)
(Feb 04, 2013)
(Feb 04, 2013)
(Feb 04, 2013)
(Feb 04, 2013)
(Jan 27, 2013)
(Jan 27, 2013)
Should IPv6 Have A Different Name?
Posted by: Jordi on Monday, February 04, 2013 - 11:24 PM
(198179 Reads) comments? Send this story to a friend Printer friendly page
A footnote to our earlier discussion on why IPv6 hasn’t been widely adopted: the numbering of the newer version is clearly designed to suggest that it’s an improved successor to IPv4. But is that name actually logical and helpful?
Complete info at Lifehacker.